“Summer, needs real user research. SQL would be nice.”
Your existing pile412 applicants, already in Workday
0asked to sign up- Candidate 0412WorkdayShipped user research, receipts attachedMeets bar
- Candidate 0418GreenhouseStrong, missing one must-have1 gap
- Candidate 0421WorkdayNo evidence against the rubricBelow bar
- Candidate 0433ReferralTwo must-haves cleared, interestedMeets bar
She screens the pile you already have.
Most of your early-career volume arrives cold through your own ATS. Barb reads that pile against your rubric and hands back a shortlist, and not one of those candidates has to hear of us or sign up for anything.
- On postWrites the rubric with youMust-haves split from nice-to-haves, agreed once
- RollingScreens every applicantYours and ours, against that rubric, as they land
- RollingChases the missing pieceAsks the candidate for the one thing that would clear them
- WeeklySyncs the shortlistStraight into Greenhouse or Lever, decisions logged
- AlwaysKeeps the audit trailEvery screen, reason and outcome, exportable
She runs the role, not a dashboard you have to check.
Rubric agreed once, every applicant screened as they land, the missing piece chased with the candidate, and the shortlist synced into Greenhouse or Lever with every decision logged.
Book a demo- Agrees the bar with you onceMust-haves split from nice-to-haves, out of one message
- Screens every applicant as they landAgainst that bar, on the evidence, never on keywords
- Asks for the one thing that would clear themStraight to the candidate, with no coordinator chasing it
- Puts an interview time in front of themProposed and confirmed without a scheduling thread
- Logs every screen with the reasonAuditable end to end, which is the part compliance asks about
What she does before you see a name.
She agrees the bar with you once, screens everyone against it as they land, asks a near miss for the one thing that would clear them, and books the interview herself, so the shortlist you open has nothing left on it to chase.
Bobfor the candidate
“Research shipped to real users, receipts attached. SQL is still building, so do not take my word on it.”
Barbfor you
“Checked against your rubric, not the resume. Both must-haves cleared, the gap is fixable before a start date.”
And when a candidate has Bob, she gets more.
Barb interviews their agent directly, verifies the claim rather than the resume, and the honest gaps come attached, so a fixable gap closes instead of costing you the hire.
How the handoff worksBoth must-haves cleared on evidence she checked herself, and the one gap named up front.
- User research, shippedverified
- Summer availabilityconfirmed
- SQL1 gap
No score decides it for you, and every screen, reason and outcome is logged and exportable.
Barb never decides. You do.
The EU AI Act makes hiring AI high risk from August 2026 and requires a human in the loop, which is how Barb has always worked, so she brings the verified evidence and the ranked read, your recruiter makes every call, and every screen is logged and exportable.
Send Barb one role.
Post a role in minutes, or book a time to talk. No software rollout either way.